Tag Archives: Alfred Bennett

p. 124 – The removal controversy, 1847-1850

that Dr. Kendrick himself had suggested they pay the fee and attend the meeting to counteract the Rochester influence.

The first important item of business was a proposed Removalist amendment to the Society’s Constitution providing that Trustees should be of three classes, the first to serve three years, the second two, and the third, one, instead of having the whole Board elected annual­ly. When the amendment had been passed and a list of nominees presented, Removalist strategy was disclosed in that the majority of those chosen for the two-and three-year terms were friends of Rochester. This move roused the ire of the Anti-Removalists and turned the meeting into a scene of wild confusion which even a “season of prayer” by the venerable Fathers Alfred Bennett and John Peck failed to quiet. The arbitrary ruling in election procedure by Elisha Tucker, the moderator, and his refusal to accept the votes of the new “members” intensified the discord. After electing their slate the Removalists then voted to withdraw the names of the new “members” and to return their money. Pandemonium again broke loose with applause from Rochester supporters and hisses from Hamilton friends.

When the resolution to release the University from its contract with the Education Society, which the Society’s Board had passed that morning to invalidate the First Compact, came up for ratification, William R. Williams was its leading advocate. In his speech he took occasion to make several harsh remarks about the local citizens, to which James W. Nye, a local attorney, replied. After protracted discussion the Removalists carried the resolution by a vote of 54 to 19. On the warm dry evening after this boisterous session some of the village boys, with parental permission, sprinkled the dusty streets with the fire engine. In sport, it was alleged, they played the hose on several dwellings. Zenas Morse, a Removalist University Trustee, former classics instructor on the faculty, and then principal of the Hamilton Academy, lived across from the Baptist Church. On reaching his house the boys, exclaiming, we go for removal by water,” flooded this unpopular citizen’s hallway. The prank perhaps lost some friends for Hamilton but the local interests excused it as an expression of youthful spirit.

The Society, reconvening in the University Chapel at eight o’clock the next morning, Thursday, August 16th took up the Board’s second resolution which definitely recommended removal. The Hamilton peo-

p. 34 – Administration, setting and staff, 1820-1833

carried heavy administrative as well as teaching responsibilities. Though these two senior members were the only ones in the group who served as trustees, other members acted with them on the Executive Committee or “took agencies” for collecting funds. Such an arrangement, which obviated lines of distinction between the administrative and teaching staffs, made for close cooperation in the common cause of education.

At first faculty organization was informal, though there is mention of a set of by-laws in the early ’20’s. In 1830 the Trustees, in place of the Executive Committee, were empowered by the Society to “appoint the Professors, determine their salaries and time of service.” Three years later the Society granted the faculty broader power “to administer in general the internal government of the Seminary” subject to approval by the Board.

As might be expected at a seminary supported by a denomination not entirely cordial to the idea of a trained clergy, faculty salaries were low. During 1822-23 Hascall received $350. The next year $400 became the standard salary for professors and remained so until 1829  when they were granted $500. The average income of college teachers for the period was about equal to that of clergymen. Alfred Bennett, one of the best known Baptist ministers of the state, never received over $400, often only $300, with some of it in produce. However, professors at Auburn Theological Seminary (Presbyterian), Brown, and Amherst earned from $200 to $600 more than Hascall and his  high-minded associates. The latter were reasonably contented with small incomes. Their great purpose was to train as many young men as
possible to become the spiritual leaders of Christians, from Hamilton to Burma.

Hascall’s teaching career started in 1818 when he began to receive young men into his home to study for the ministry. Most of the ten students present at the opening of the Seminary in the ‘brick academy” in 1820 had studied with him privately. His appointment as the first teacher seems to have been tentative, hut in 1822 the Executive Committee “Voted that Brother Daniel Hascall be considered as has long been the design of this Committee, Professor of Languages in this Institution.” From 1828 to 1832 he also taught “Natural Philosophy.”

Hascall’s background and experience fitted him very well for instructing