Category Archives: Chapter 8

p. 152 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 152 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

But by the late ’50’s, the long-time student interest in maintaining buildings and grounds seems to have given way to an enthusiasm for gymnastic exercises. Through their own endeavors they built a gymnasium in 1858 and equipped it with a trapeze, ropes and rings, and other apparatus. The next year the Trustees hired a janitor to keep the classrooms clean, shovel paths in winter and do other jobs students had usually done.

The need for an auditorium larger than the chapel in West Hall led to the construction of the Hall of Alumni and Friends. In 1858 Henry C. Vogell, Class of 1827, a University Trustee and pastor at Rome, New York, began soliciting subscriptions for a $20,000 building fund. The laying of the cornerstone took place the next year at commencement, with the presidents of Brown and Hamilton as honored guests. Since the Trustees had been unable to agree on a site, three having been considered, the ceremony took place on the north side of East and West Halls. Immediately afterward, however, they chose a location west of these structures. The Cottage Edifice which stood on part of the site was razed and by the following August the new three-story building, 107 feet by 75 feet, was nearly ready for the roof. Observers viewed with great interest the aerial tramway, suggested by Washington A. Roebling who later designed the Brooklyn Bridge, which conveyed the stone for the walls from the University quarry on the Hill above to the workmen below; as the staging was raised the lower end of the tramway was elevated.

One cornerstone, whether the original or not is unknown, carries the proud inscription: “Quod conamur perficimus“ (“We complete what we attempt”). These were brave words, for only the chapel, which occupied the entire third floor, was finished by August 1861. Vogell’s accounts had not balanced and the Trustees were obliged to borrow additional funds. Nonetheless, dedication exercises were held the day before commencement. The choir and congregation sang two original hymns by Samuel F. Smith, the author of “America.” The following stanza from the second was eminently fitting for the occasion:

 

Here may no Science, falsely named,
Thy sacred Word deny –
May error here be shunned and shamed,
In knowledge from on high.

 

The night prior to the exercises prankster students built a huge

Comments Off on p. 152 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 152, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged , ,

p. 151 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 151 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

seem to appeal to them but in 1863 these gentlemen and their brother, Robert, proposed that the University and the Education Society attempt to raise $70,000 and offered to match any sum collected up to $30,000. Of the total amount secured, about $15,000 was used to cancel the Society’s debt, $5,000 invested for the use of the library, and the balance, some $43,000 added to the endowment.

The largest single donation was received in 1865 when James B. Colgate and John B. Trevor gave $70,000. They provided that $40,000 be designated the Trevor Education Fund, the income to be used for scholarships for Civil War veterans or their sons, and the remainder to be set aside as a fund for the expenses of the Presidency. The next year they made another gift of $10,000 to constitute an investment fund for campus improvements. Mr. Colgate and Mr. Trevor were partners in James B. Colgate and Company, a large brokerage firm with offices in New York, Baltimore, and Washington. They dealt also in precious metals, and during the Civil War Mr. Colgate assisted the Federal government in maintaining its gold reserve. In addition to contributing to Madison University, Mr. Trevor was a generous benefactor to the University of Rochester.

By 1869 the University had an endowment of more than $180,000 and no indebtedness. Contributions from the churches for current expenses of the Education Society increased from less than $1,000 in 1865 to nearly $13,000, some four years later. To augment the existing University funds and to provide for repairs and new equipment, Treasurer Spear and others, in 1868, launched a successful campaign for a $100,000 “Jubilee Offering.” There were now ample resources for future expansion.

The campus in the 1850’s and ’60’s was still as rural as it had always been. Except for paths flanked by beautiful shade trees, every acre was either “plowed, mowed, or pastured.” An ugly unpainted board fence enclosed the grounds and broad stretches of meadow land which extended in almost every direction over the hills invited youths, disgusted with dull textbooks, for long walks on bright afternoons. In 1851 the students voluntarily laid a mile of hemlock plank walk from the foot of the hill to Broad Street and from the Boarding Hall to the Baptist meeting house and lined each side with maples. Their efforts, coming at a time when every gesture of confidence in the University strengthened morale, gained them the Trustees’ sincere appreciation.

Comments Off on p. 151 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 151, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged , , ,

p. 150 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 150 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

them for funds for the University of Rochester. Both sides sought particularly to win over the wealthy iron merchant and philanthropist, Garrat N. Bleecker, who proved to be a decided Madison supporter; his check for $3,000 was the largest single contribution to the endow­ment. Other agents circulated among the upstate Baptist churches, and there, also, met rivals from Rochester. The solicitors for both institutions proved remarkably successful, thanks to the high level of agricultural prosperity then prevailing in the region. By August 1851, the friends of Madison, having exceeded their goal of $60,000 by $7,000, were ready to lift it to $100,000, a sum they did not achieve.

The University endowment drive naturally cut into the Education Society’s income since its patrons had first to pay their endowment pledges, and consequently the latter organization had a deficit of about $15,000 for several years. The Society had originally incurred most of its indebtedness by attempting to support more beneficiaries than funds permitted. Then, the growing apathy of the churches to the cause of ministerial education in the late ’50’s and the demands of charities attendant on the Civil War greatly reduced annual contributions. The University treasury likewise experienced stringency, forcing the Trustees in 1861 to cut salaries.

To Professors Spear, Eaton and others, invested funds seemed the answer to financial worries. Despite his $2,000 contribution to the endowment in 1850, Deacon Colgate resolutely opposed this means of support, citing Scriptural caution against “anxious care for the morrow” and “distrusting our Lord for the future.” As Dr. Eaton wrote years later, “This had been good advice, had all been like-minded with him and been as ready to give according to their ability.” Fortunately for the University, the Deacon’s friend, Garrat Bleecker, dissented, and in 1853 left the institution $12,000 which, with the $3,000 he had given in 1850, he directed to be used as the foundation for the University’s first chair, the Bleecker Professorship of Intellectual and Moral Philosophy.

Professor Spear, noting that the University’s invested funds had mitigated the effect of the Panic of 1857 on its treasury, urged Deacon Colgate’s sons, James B. and Samuel, to assist in raising $30,000 for its sister corporation, the Education Society, and, more particularly, to establish a Colgate professorship by adding $13,000 to the $2,000 their father had given to the original endowment, The latter idea did not

Comments Off on p. 150 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 150, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged , , ,

p. 149 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 149 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869
Old President’s House
Picture of house

experience. Knowing, however, that he already had the nod from the New York City Trustees and the sanction of dominant local sentiment, Dr. Eaton accepted the Board’s selection. The President-elect magnanimously sought him out, the morning after his public statement, to tell Eaton that he admired his frankness and was confident they could cooperate for the best interest of the University.

Finances from 1850 to 1869 are perhaps a more graphic index of the University’s recovery and progress than its administration. With the settlement of the Removal issue there were liabilities of over $30,000 and no funds. Professors Eaton and Spear and Treasurer Alvah Pierce of the Education Society at once set to work trying to raise the $60,000 endowment decided on in May 1850. They began in Hamilton where the residents subscribed approximately $21,000 with Professor Spear and his father jointly heading the list with $2,200 and Deacons Pierce and William Cobb with $2,000 each. Before classes resumed in the fall, Eaton and Spear conducted a two-and-a-half-week campaign among New York City Baptists. Starting with Deacon William Colgate, at whose gracious home they were “nicely domiciled,” they interviewed other friends and addressed public meetings, often encountering Professor Raymond, John N. Wilder and others who were competing with

Comments Off on p. 149 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 149, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged ,

Ebenezer Dodge elected as University president (p. 148)

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on Ebenezer Dodge elected as University president (p. 148)

three candidates, to accept, the Board in August, 1868, chose Professor Dodge. Eaton continued as President of the Seminary, a position he had held since its creation in 1861. In commenting on Dodge, one local observer described him as “one unexcitable, cool, and dispassionate, who could administer the required discipline of the school, with a determined hand.”

If Dr. Eaton had never taken the presidency of the University, his career would have been an unqualified success. He was a good teacher, popular with his students and well-regarded in the village and in the Baptist denomination. He liked human contacts and he and Mrs. Eaton dispensed generous hospitality at “Woodland Height,” which was one of the most attractive spots on the Hill, set as it was among beeches and hemlocks. A cedar hedge, sweet briar on the walls, a lilac path, and a “Lovers’ lane” of snowball bushes added to its charm. The Eatons entertained extensively, particularly at commencement, when visitors filled faculty and village homes, and their receptions at this season were gala occasions. In 1866 Mrs. Eaton prepared sponge cake and lemonade for a crowd of over 300 which gathered in the brilliantly lighted house and wandered about in the yard decorated with Chinese lanterns; the last guest departed at 2:00 a.m.

The University profited from the social leadership which the President and his wife provided. Its distinguished visitors were assured a warm welcome at their home and callow students, whether they came to court the attractive Eaton daughters or on more serious business, found an environment which taught them manners and poise. The University also profited from the cordial town and gown relations which the Eatons fostered as they moved in village society. The citizens remembered gratefully that the President and Professor Spear had been the two most stalwart defenders of the Hamilton location in the Removal Controversy.

With the inauguration of President Dodge in 1868, old memories had dimmed. When he had come to the campus fifteen years before, the University was already well on the way to recovering from the effects of the troublesome ’40’s. Soon a highly valued member of the faculty, Dodge had quietly built a reputation for original teaching but it was the Presidency, especially after 1869, however, which was to disclose his full stature. Eaton, alone of his colleagues, had publicly opposed the appointment on the ground that Dodge lacked administrative

Comments Off on Ebenezer Dodge elected as University president (p. 148)

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 148, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869, timeline

Tagged , ,

p. 147 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 147 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

sistence, and sagacity, Dr. Eaton found uncongenial. He preferred rather to represent the University at public assemblies or, in his ornate style, to discuss abstract ideas from the platform or pulpit. The dogged, methodical Professor Spear took over many of the less colorful duties, including those as Librarian, but his.. special interest was finances. Others, the Trustees themselves often managed. Aversion to administration and a desire to give full time to his theological professorship explain Eaton’s enthusiastic efforts to induce ex-Governor George Nixon Briggs of Massachusetts, a prominent Baptist, to become “Chancellor” of the University. Interestingly enough, Eaton began this abortive movement in 1859, only three years after he had taken office, and was joined in it by the entire faculty.

Strained relations between the President and the faculty appeared in 1862 when they refused to support him on a question of honorary degrees. Mrs. Eaton recorded in her diary that a professor told her that one member had been so impudent to the President at a faculty meeting that, had her informant been in Dr. Eaton’s place, “he would have pitched him out the window.” His two foremost critics were Alexander M. Beebee Jr., and Ebenezer Dodge. Beebee, the son of the editor of the Baptist Register, a member of the Class of 1847, and graduate of the Seminary, had joined the faculty in 1850 as Professor of Logic and English Literature. Dodge, an alumnus of Brown University, and Newton Theological Seminary, had replaced Professor Turney in 1853. Appointed under the Colgate family’s sponsorship and enjoying their confidence, he was in a strong position.

The stresses of office impaired Dr. Eaton’s health, and on medical advice in 1853 he went to Europe for a change and to rest. His trip was a moderate success but he complained bitterly that the Trustees failed to provide him with sufficient funds, unaware that James B. Colgate had arranged with a London banker to honor all his drafts. He also worried and fretted about University matters. His return in May 1864, was the occasion for cordial and enthusiastic welcome by students, townspeople and faculty, who had gathered at his home“Woodland Height.”

The year 1864-65 saw no material improvement in conditions and with the Civil War over an opportune time had come for the President to resign. He did so in July 1865, but, at the request of the Trustees, continued to serve until his successor was selected. Failing to induce

Comments Off on p. 147 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 147, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged , , , , ,

p. 146 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 146 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869
President George W. Eaton, 1856-58, A0999-3, p146

plinary committee. Since Eaton was also the senior professor of the
Seminary, no conflict developed as in Taylor’s time, concerning his
authority over students in that department, and in 1861 its own
instructors took responsibility for their conduct. Though the faculty
was disinclined at first to assist the President in what had heretofore
been a function of his office, members did sit on the disciplinary
committee until Lucien M. Osborn, Professor of Mathematics and
Natural Philosophy, took over its duties in 1865. Two years later,
however, the faculty relieved him of the disagreeable task.

The routine administrative chores requiring attention to detail, per

Comments Off on p. 146 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 146, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

George Eaton elected as president (p. 145)

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on George Eaton elected as president (p. 145)

showed characteristic practicality in appraising the value of education. He pointed out that college training was only the foundation for a career and that industry, health, and common sense were equally important for success. No “ivory tower” theorist, he urged his hearers to study human nature in life as well as in books. “Your liberal education,” he told them, “supersedes none of the advantages common to the educated and uneducated; but it qualifies you to apply them all with superior skill and power in the discharge of your duties to God and man.”

Within two years of taking office, President Taylor suffered a severe spinal disease from which he never recovered. His fine physique was emaciated and stooped, and though his vitality ebbed he still possessed wonderful energy and an iron will which enabled him to carry on his duties to within a few weeks of his death. Emily, his pretty black-eyed daughter, was his amanuensis, and student watchers sat by his bedside during the nights of pain. He died January 7, 1856, and three days later, after a funeral service in the chapel hung with crepe, he was buried in the University cemetery.

Under Dr. Taylor the University recovered the position and strength which it had lost during the Removal Controversy. His administration demonstrated that the institution’s powers of endurance and recuperation justified public confidence in its future. In the resolutions occasioned by his death, the University Trustees mourned him as “a respected and efficient President, a successful Teacher, and able Executive Officer, a man of great promptness and energy, of large experience, of singular tact, a man of Science and of true devotion to the cause of Religion and learning.”

After Dr. Taylor’s death, Professor Eaton as senior member of the faculty served as chairman until his election to the Presidency in August 1856. He was reluctant to take the office because his chief interest was theological instruction. There was doubt, moreover, as to his qualifications. He stood in marked contrast to his predecessor who exemplified the popular conception of the time that a college president should be primarily a disciplinarian. Eaton disliked enforcing order among the students and gave them the impression that he experienced pain and distress equal to that of the culprit himself.

At the outset of the new administration the Trustees directed the faculty to select two members to act with the President as a disci-

Comments Off on George Eaton elected as president (p. 145)

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 145, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869, timeline

Tagged

p. 144 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 144 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

As might have been expected, Dr. Taylor maintained that responsibility for the conduct and discipline of all parts of the University rested with the President. The Seminary had, however, enjoyed a certain degree of independence resulting from its prestige, age, and the mature character of its students who represented a powerful group united by close ties of vocational interest. Professor Edmund Turney and, to a lesser extent, Professor Eaton held that the Seminary faculty, rather than the President, should be responsible for the theological students. Turney, a graduate of the Class of 1838 and a former theological student himself, had joined the faculty in 1850 as Professor of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation in the Seminary and Evidences of Revealed Religion in the College. Conscientious and generally popular with students and townspeople, he steadily fought Dr. Taylor’s views in a long series of faculty meetings and before the Trustees.

The point at issue was so fundamental to the relationship of the Education Society and University that joint action by both Boards was required for its resolution. On February 9, 1853, they adopted four articles of Agreement, referred to as the Second Compact, which placed with the University Trustees ultimate responsibility for maintaining and managing all three departments of the institution under one faculty and one code of laws. Though authority for the government and discipline of the college and academic departments centered in the President of the University, he and “the senior Theological Professor” were “associated as peers” for preserving order in the Seminary. In these provisions the Trustees upheld Turney’s views in limiting the President’s power, but the bitter friction between the two men resulted in Turney’s resignation a few months later.

With the question of jurisdiction clarified, the faculty and trustees were then able to complete the revision of the Laws. As chief disciplinary officer the President was vested with parental authority and “expected in governing, to prefer the mildest effectual measures” in punishing “all crimes and offenses committed by students.” He was also directed “to deliver for the benefit of his pupils, familiar lectures in regard to their physical health, personal habits, manners and morals” and “constantly to endeavor to promote a salutary mutual influence among the several officers, classes, and departments.”

Students thought Dr. Taylor “a brusk, stern, yet kindly man” and an enthusiastic teacher. In his address to the graduating Class of 1853, he

Comments Off on p. 144 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 144, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged

p. 143 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted on May 3, 2012 by | Comments Off on p. 143 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

President Stephen W. Taylor 1851-56, Alumni Files, p143

 

a salary of $1,000 per year. The definition of his duties and prerogatives they left to a committee of five of their own members and professors to determine. Three months later, Dr. Taylor accepted the offer, much to the distress of the Lewisburg Board, who deeply appreciated his exertions and sacrifice in establishing their university. The President-elect, appreciating the extraordinary and challenging responsibilities he was about to assume, wrote with reference to the Madison Trustees:

I crave & expect an interest in their prayers for constant purity of motives and all needful supplies of wisdom and strength; I crave a large share of their fraternal charity which covers a multitude of sins, &, in good degree, gives, to a fellow laborer, cheerfulness, &, success; &, finally, I crave & expect their own generous and constant cooperation.

The definition of presidential duties and authority which Dr. Taylor had requested was postponed. until after he took office in September 1851. The Trustees probably decided that since this matter was actually a part of the revision of the Laws of 1840 which they already had directed the faculty to undertake, it would be wise to give the new President a chance to participate in the discussion. They also knew they could rely on his highly developed sense of order and discipline in bringing the University’s administrative policies up to date. To confront so strong-minded a man with a set of regulations which he found unsatisfactory would have invited trouble as soon as he set foot in the campus.

Comments Off on p. 143 – Recovery and expansion, 1850-1869

Posted in Chapter 8, p. 143, Recovery and Expansion, 1850-1869

Tagged