gation that deterioration was most serious and that in their opinion the chief causes were the poor quality of the average entering student, an apparently lax faculty attitude toward academic responsibilities, and undue pressure from outside activities. Responding to their recommendations the faculty: limited entrance to about 200 of the best applicants; refused to permit new students to register until all their credentials had been approved; and urged that highest academic standards be maintained with no concessions to extracurricular activities and that the amount of required work be increased by about 25 percent. Other reforms included reducing the amount of time required for athletic practice, a tougher policy on excused class absences, a more rigid control of schedules for teams and other groups traveling off campus, more stringent rules on eligibility for extracurricular activities, and the adoption of a quality point system which meant in effect that a student must have an average standing of C in all his work to graduate.
The curricular aims of the College remained substantially unchanged throughout the Bryan period. Its essential purpose was to provide a liberal education and character training as preparation for whatever profession its graduates might enter. With the Class of 1914 business rather than teaching for the first time attracted the largest number of graduates. With the Class of 1916 the percentage going into the marketplace made a notable increase which remained steady.
Instruction in the humanities saw various changes and innovations.
The beloved Newton Lloyd Andrews retired in 1918 as the Professor of the Greek Language and Literature to be succeeded in 1920 by Richard A. Parrock, an 1891 graduate of Pembroke College, Cambridge. Principal Frank L. Shepardson joined the Classics Department to teach Greek as well as to become Treasurer after the Academy was discontinued in 1912, and James C. Austin, A.B., Syracuse, 1916, was added in 1921 to teach Latin. After Dr. Andrews retired, Dean Crawshaw introduced courses in General Literature including those in Greek literature in translation which Dr. Andrews had offered. “Craw” maintained that literature courses had great value as a “liberalizing” influence, especially for students entering business or science. Their response was so great that some of his classes, especially Shakespeare, had to be held in the chapel-testimony to the truth of his conviction and his inspired teaching. Elmer W. Smith, ’91, who had come from Colgate Academy to the English department in 1908, specialized in
